If I had to let one of the two go, not sure which it would be. But the excellent internal tuner of the g90 makes up for it! The g90 is also much more portable-friendly. The one feature I do miss on the g90 is recordable CW messages for repeating CQ calls. In fact I run the 7300 at 20w almost exclusively as well. I don't find the 20 watt max output of the g90 a seriously limiting factor. As to the xmiter, again both do well what I do mostly, CW, SSB, and some digital. The system integrates with the logbook in Ham Radio Deluxe to provide an. I am happy with the smaller display on the g90. Signals can be bairly perceptable on the waterfall, yet can still be fully decoded. Both exceed the 7000, 7100 ft817nd and ft857d and other rigs I've owned. Overall the g90 seems a bit simpler to use and adjust but capabilities are very similar. Using an external speaker or headphones they are same. The receive audio out of the box of the g90 is more pleasant to me than the 7300. I like the way you tune it vs the way you tune the 7300. I find the g90 receiver equal to the 7300. On the spectrum display, the PTT knob increases the signal level as expected, but there is no apparent connection between the selected signal and it appears to be decoding the noise floor with random UNICODE characters.īill BillSr Posts: 6 Joined: 10.After posting the pictures below on Facebook yesterday someone asked, " I would be interested to know how to you compare the G90 with the IC-7300?" I really like both. Speed: - The slider will vary the scan speed, slower to the left, faster to the right. I am wondering if there is something wrong with the interaction of VB and DM-780. Step Size: - There is a choice from 10Hz through to 25kHz. This release includes a number of important changes including the addition of the Icom IC-7610, resolves a Logbook exit problem, resolves sort on LOTW date, API for QSO Forwarding now populates Logbook with My Station data, a number of fixes for the Kenwood TS-480, applications remember screen position, enable. I have a filter set in VB for the Navigator "Burr-Brown from TI USB Audio CODEC", and all six ports of the Navigator show assigned COMs in the Win 8.1 Device Manager, and the USB Audio CODEC is shown in the Sound Devices in Device Manager. The signals look excellent on the waterfall, but the decode is nothing but random jibberesh! At one point, I was getting correct decodes when my Elecraft KX3 volume was turned up to where apparently the IMac soundcard was decoding, rather than the Navigator. I have installed the latest HRD version (6.2.71.286) which was just released this week. I am running VB 4.3.14 r95030 and Win 8.1 Guest. Is anyone successfully using Ham Radio Deluxe (HRD) DM-780 for Ham Radio Digital modes? For some reason, I can't get the PSK-31 signals to decode correctly with a Timewave Navigator.
0 kommentar(er)
